Skip to content

Conversation

gballet
Copy link
Member

@gballet gballet commented Aug 22, 2025

Full disclosure: this has been generated by AI. The goal is to have a quick check that the PR format is correct, before we merge it. This is to avoid the periodical case when someone forgets to add a milestone or check the title matches our preferred format.

@gballet gballet requested a review from rjl493456442 August 22, 2025 07:30
@gballet gballet changed the title .github/workflows: naive PR format checker naive PR format checker Aug 22, 2025
@gballet gballet changed the title naive PR format checker .github/workflows: naive PR format checker Aug 22, 2025
@gballet gballet added this to the 1.16.3 milestone Aug 22, 2025
@gballet gballet force-pushed the pr-format-checker branch from e36a082 to ffcc8e8 Compare August 22, 2025 07:48
@gballet gballet modified the milestone: 1.16.3 Aug 22, 2025
@MariusVanDerWijden
Copy link
Member

I like the idea, but the workflow is only triggered on a commit, so if we only add the milestone or rename the PR, it will not be retriggered. I like the naming one, since it will encourage/force contributors to adhere to our naming guidelines

@gballet
Copy link
Member Author

gballet commented Aug 22, 2025

it is run on edits too, you can see in the history that it ran after I changed the name. The milestone indeed doesn't seem to run if I remove it. I'll double-check, because it should.

@gballet gballet removed this from the 1.16.3 milestone Aug 22, 2025
@gballet
Copy link
Member Author

gballet commented Aug 22, 2025

indeed it doesn't, at least not right away. The name change does work though, and the milestone isn't such a big deal after all. I'll comment it out for now.

@gballet gballet added this to the 1.16.3 milestone Aug 22, 2025
s1na
s1na previously approved these changes Aug 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@s1na s1na left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regulate

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

This is a really good idea.

@cskiraly
Copy link
Contributor

looks good

@gballet gballet merged commit a9ac275 into ethereum:master Aug 25, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@s1na
Copy link
Contributor

s1na commented Aug 29, 2025

Btw this fails for root-level files e.g. README.md, AUTHORS etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants